Home Blog Page 21

Pakistan Army and its Commitments to the Nation

By
Chaudhary Saifullah Ejaz
-
0

Pakistan Army is the land-based branch of the Pakistan Armed Forces. It plays a significant role in ensuring the security and defense of Pakistan. The army’s commitment to the nation can be understood through several key aspects but not limited to the national defense, Internal Security, Disaster relief and humanitarian assistance, Nation building, Peacekeeping missions.

National Defense

The primary responsibility of the Pakistani Army is to safeguard the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Pakistan. It is committed to protecting the nation from external threats and maintaining peace and stability within its borders. It is pertinent to mention that National defense in Pakistan is a critical aspect that ensures the protection of the country’s territorial integrity, sovereignty, and national interests.

The Pakistani Army, as the land-based branch of the Pakistan Armed Forces, plays a central role in national defense. In General, the Pakistani Army is dedicated to the national defense of Pakistan and works closely with other branches of the Pakistan Armed Forces, as well as civilian institutions, to safeguard the country’s interests and ensure its security.

Here are some key points regarding national defense in Pakistan and the role of the Pakistani Army.

Threat Perception: Pakistan faces various security challenges, including external threats and internal security concerns. The country shares borders with India, Afghanistan, Iran, and China, and the Pakistani Army is responsible for countering potential threats and ensuring the defense of the nation.

Defense Strategy: Pakistan’s defense strategy focuses on maintaining a credible deterrence capability. The Pakistani Army, along with the Pakistan Air Force and Pakistan Navy, works together to develop and implement this strategy. It involves a combination of conventional and unconventional warfare capabilities, including a strong conventional military force, a robust nuclear deterrence, and counterinsurgency measures.

Conventional Warfare: The Pakistani Army maintains a well-trained and equipped conventional force to protect the country against external aggression. It has a diverse range of land-based capabilities, including armored divisions, artillery, infantry, and other specialized units. The army conducts regular training exercises, develops doctrines, and acquires modern military technology to enhance its combat effectiveness.

Nuclear Deterrence: Pakistan possesses a nuclear arsenal, and the Pakistani Army plays a crucial role in safeguarding and maintaining this deterrent capability. The army is responsible for the security, safety, and control of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons. It ensures that these weapons are only used as a deterrent against any potential aggression, thereby ensuring the country’s security.

Border Security: The Pakistani Army is actively involved in securing the borders of Pakistan. It conducts border patrols, establishes border posts, and monitors any suspicious activities along the borders. The army works closely with other law enforcement agencies to prevent cross-border infiltration, smuggling, and other illegal activities.

Internal Security Operations: In addition to external defense, the Pakistani Army is engaged in internal security operations to counter terrorism, insurgency, and maintain law and order. It assists civilian law enforcement agencies in conducting operations against extremist groups and ensuring the safety of Pakistani citizens.

Regional and International Cooperation: The Pakistani Army engages in regional and international military cooperation to enhance its defense capabilities and contribute to regional stability. It participates in joint military exercises, exchanges military delegations, and cooperates with other countries on defense matters.

Internal Security

In addition to external defense, the Pakistani Army is actively involved in maintaining internal security. It assists civilian law enforcement agencies in combating terrorism, insurgencies, and other security challenges within the country. This commitment is crucial in ensuring the safety of Pakistani citizens and the stability of the nation. As internal security is a crucial aspect for any nation, and the Pakistani Army plays a significant role in maintaining internal security within Pakistan.  

It is important to note that while the Pakistani Army plays a crucial and significant role in maintaining internal security, it operates within the framework of the law and under the overall control and guidance of the civilian government. The army’s actions are aimed at protecting the welfare of Pakistani citizens and ensuring peace and stability within the country.

Here are some key points regarding internal security and the role of the Pakistani Army.

Counter terrorism Operations: Pakistan has faced significant challenges related to terrorism and extremism. The Pakistani Army has been actively involved in conducting counterterrorism operations across the country. It works in close coordination with other law enforcement agencies, such as the police and paramilitary forces, to neutralize terrorist networks, dismantle their infrastructure, and ensure the safety of Pakistani citizens.

Border Security: The Pakistani Army is responsible for securing the borders of Pakistan, which is vital for maintaining internal security. It conducts border patrols, establishes checkpoints, and employs surveillance measures to prevent cross-border infiltration, smuggling, and other illegal activities that may pose threats to internal security.

Support to Civilian Law Enforcement: The Pakistani Army provides support to civilian law enforcement agencies in maintaining law and order in various situations. This assistance may include assisting the police in controlling riots, maintaining public order during emergencies, and providing backup in high-risk operations.

Intelligence and Surveillance: The Pakistani Army contributes to intelligence gathering efforts to identify potential security threats within the country. It works closely with intelligence agencies to collect and analyze information, monitor suspicious activities, and take preemptive measures to counter any potential threats to internal security.

Rehabilitation and Reconstruction: The Pakistani Army is involved in post-conflict rehabilitation and reconstruction efforts. After successfully conducting military operations in conflict-affected areas, the army participates in rebuilding infrastructure, providing humanitarian assistance, and facilitating the return of displaced persons. This helps restore normalcy and improve the overall security situation.

Training and Capacity Building: The Pakistani Army plays a vital role in training and capacity building of civilian law enforcement agencies. It conducts training programs for police forces, paramilitary units, and other security agencies to enhance their capabilities in countering internal security threats effectively.

Crisis Response and Disaster Management: The Pakistani Army has a strong commitment to crisis response and disaster management. It actively participates in rescue and relief operations during natural disasters, such as earthquakes, floods, and avalanches. The army’s quick response, deployment of resources, and coordination with civil authorities contribute significantly to mitigating the impact of such disasters and maintaining internal security.

Disaster Relief and Humanitarian Assistance

Pakistani Army has a strong commitment to providing relief and assistance during natural disasters and humanitarian crises. It has played a vital role in rescue operations, providing medical aid, distributing food and supplies, and rebuilding infrastructure in the aftermath of earthquakes, floods, and other calamities.

The army’s prompt response and relief efforts demonstrate its commitment to the welfare of the Pakistani people. Its involvement in disaster management and humanitarian operations is a significant aspect of its responsibilities towards the nation. The Pakistani Army’s commitment to disaster relief and humanitarian assistance reflects its dedication to the well-being and safety of the Pakistani people. Its swift response, logistical capabilities, and expertise in crisis management contribute significantly to alleviating suffering and restoring normalcy in disaster-affected areas.

Here are some key points regarding the Pakistani Army’s contributions in disaster relief and humanitarian assistances.

Prompt Response: The Pakistani Army is known for its prompt response in the aftermath of natural disasters. Whether it is earthquakes, floods, avalanches, or other calamities, the army mobilizes quickly to provide immediate relief and assistance to affected areas.

Search and Rescue Operations: The army actively engages in search and rescue operations to locate and save individuals trapped or stranded in disaster-stricken areas. It deploys specialized teams, equipment, and resources to conduct rescue missions, often working in coordination with other national and international relief agencies.

Medical Aid and Field Hospitals: The army sets up field hospitals and medical camps in disaster-affected areas to provide essential medical aid and healthcare services to those in need. This includes emergency medical treatment, surgeries, vaccination campaigns, and disease control measures to prevent outbreaks in the aftermath of disasters.

Distribution of Food and Supplies: The Pakistani Army plays a vital role in distributing food, water, and essential supplies to affected communities. It ensures that affected populations have access to basic necessities and provisions, especially in remote and inaccessible areas where relief efforts may face logistical challenges.

Temporary Shelter and Rehabilitation: The army assists in providing temporary shelter and rehabilitation facilities for displaced individuals and families. It sets up tent cities, establishes temporary settlements, and contributes to the construction of transitional housing to ensure the well-being and safety of those affected by disasters. Reconstruction and Infrastructure Development: Following major disasters, the Pakistani Army actively participates in the reconstruction and rehabilitation efforts. It helps in rebuilding infrastructure, including roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, and other essential facilities that may have been damaged or destroyed.

Coordination with Civil Authorities and International Agencies: The Pakistani Army collaborates closely with civilian government authorities, national disaster management agencies, and international relief organizations to ensure effective coordination and efficient utilization of resources in disaster relief operations. This collaborative approach enhances the overall effectiveness of relief efforts.

Nation-Building

The Pakistani Army also plays a significant role in nation-building endeavors. It is involved in various development projects, such as building schools, hospitals, and infrastructure in remote and underprivileged areas of the country. The army’s commitment to socio-economic progress aims to uplift the standard of living and enhance the well-being of the population. While its primary role is national defense, the army recognizes the importance of contributing to the overall development and progress of the nation.

Following are some key points regarding the Pakistani Army’s involvement in nation-building.

Infrastructure Development: The Pakistani Army undertakes infrastructure development projects in various parts of the country, especially in remote and underprivileged areas. These projects include the construction of schools, hospitals, roads, bridges, and other essential infrastructure to improve the quality of life and facilitate socio-economic development.

Education and Skill Development: The army places significant emphasis on education and skill development. It operates a network of educational institutions, including schools and colleges that provide quality education to both children of army personnel and the general public. The army also conducts vocational training programs to enhance the skills of individuals, contributing to their employability and economic empowerment.

Health Services: The army is actively involved in providing healthcare services to underserved communities. It operates a network of military hospitals and medical facilities across the country that offer medical treatment, surgeries, and specialized healthcare services. The army’s medical teams also participate in medical camps and outreach programs, reaching out to remote areas with limited access to healthcare.

Community Development: The Pakistani Army engages in community development projects, focusing on uplifting the socio-economic conditions of marginalized communities. These initiatives may include water supply schemes, sanitation projects, electrification efforts, and agriculture development programs. By addressing basic needs and improving living standards, the army aims to contribute to the overall well-being of the population.

Environmental Conservation: The Pakistani Army actively participates in environmental conservation and disaster management efforts. It conducts tree plantation drives, promotes environmental awareness, and supports initiatives for natural resource conservation. The army also plays a crucial role in disaster preparedness and response, contributing to reducing the impact of natural calamities.

Sports and Youth Development: The army encourages sports and youth development initiatives. It organizes and supports various sporting events, promoting physical fitness and nurturing talent among young individuals. The army also offers opportunities for youth engagement through programs like the Pakistan Army Youth Outreach Program, which aims to develop leadership skills and promote a sense of national pride.

Peacekeeping and International Cooperation: The Pakistani Army actively participates in United Nations peacekeeping missions, contributing to global peace and stability. Its involvement in peacekeeping operations helps in conflict resolution, humanitarian assistance, and post-conflict reconstruction, thereby promoting nation-building efforts in other countries as well.

Peacekeeping Missions

Pakistani troops have a long history of participating in United Nations peacekeeping missions worldwide. The army’s commitment to international peace and stability is reflected in its active involvement in peacekeeping operations. Pakistani soldiers have served in several countries, contributing to conflict resolution, humanitarian efforts, and post-conflict reconstruction. Pakistan is among the largest contributors of troops to UN peacekeeping operations, demonstrating its dedication to promoting global peace and stability.

Following are some key points regarding the Pakistani Army’s involvement in peacekeeping missions

Contributions and Deployments: Pakistan has a rich history of contributing troops, police personnel, and military observers to UN peacekeeping missions around the world. Pakistani peacekeepers have been deployed to various conflict zones and post-conflict areas, including countries such as Congo, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Sudan, Ivory Coast, and more.

Military Expertise: The Pakistani Army’s expertise in military operations, counterinsurgency, and peacekeeping operations makes it a valuable asset in UN missions. Pakistani troops have demonstrated professionalism, discipline, and dedication in maintaining peace and stability in complex and challenging environments.

Conflict Resolution: Pakistani peacekeepers actively contribute to conflict resolution efforts in their assigned areas. They engage in a wide range of activities, including monitoring ceasefires, facilitating negotiations, promoting dialogue between conflicting parties, and supporting the implementation of peace agreements.

Humanitarian Assistance: In addition to maintaining peace and security, Pakistani peacekeepers often provide humanitarian assistance to the local population. This includes medical support, engineering projects, assistance in infrastructure development, and support for essential services like education and healthcare.

Capacity Building: The Pakistani Army is actively involved in capacity building and training programs for peacekeepers from other nations. It shares its expertise and experiences in peacekeeping operations, conducts training exercises, and helps strengthen the capabilities of peacekeeping forces from different countries.

Women in Peacekeeping: The Pakistani Army has also made efforts to increase the participation of women in peacekeeping missions. Pakistani female peacekeepers have played significant roles in empowering women in conflict-affected areas, addressing gender-based violence, and promoting women’s rights and participation in decision-making processes.

Recognition and Sacrifice: The Pakistani Army’s contributions to peacekeeping have been widely recognized and appreciated by the international community. Pakistani peacekeepers have received numerous awards and accolades for their professionalism and sacrifices in upholding the principles of peacekeeping.

While concluding this article it is pertinent mention that Pak army is a symbol of strength and sovereign nation. It commitment to the nation building in unprecedented in the region. Most importantly the commitment of the Pakistani Army to the nation is in line with the overall policies and objectives set by the government of Pakistan. The army operates under civilian control and is dedicated to upholding the constitution, protecting national interests, and ensuring the welfare of the Pakistani people.

- Advertisement -

Critical Reflection on the Single National Curriculum and the Medium of Instruction

By
Sherdil Khaga
-
0

‘Critical Reflection on the Single National Curriculum and the Medium of Instruction’ is a remarkable work by Anjum Altaf, one of Pakistan’s most prominent educationists. The book consists of several essays in which he prompts readers to contemplate the deteriorating state of education in Pakistan, the stagnant curriculum, and the prevailing inequality in the education sector. Altaf raises numerous questions about the Single National Curriculum (SNC) in this book, highlighting its flaws. The book is divided into four parts.

In Part 1, the author emphasizes the rights of children. He poses a significant question: What if we considered children as political actors with the right to vote? If we adopted this perspective, the situation would be different, as children would have the ability to raise their voices and demand their right to quality education.

The second part extensively explores the SNC. The author astutely remarks that if a national curriculum were a panacea for the problem of national disintegration, then there would be no rise of Scottish and Irish nationalism in the United Kingdom, which also has a national curriculum. The same principle applies to Pakistan. The state must acknowledge that a national curriculum is not the sole solution. Instead, embracing diversity in education leads to a more cohesive society.

The state should learn from Zia’s experiment of imposing a national curriculum, which focused more on instilling morality in students rather than providing education. The state needs to recognize that morality cannot be imposed on society; it naturally develops through proper education. That is why the first directive from God was to read, not to be moral.

Furthermore, the author criticizes the process of formulating the SNC. He believes that parents, skeptical minds, and prominent educationists in the country were not consulted during the development of the SNC. Moreover, the government employed a team of 400 individuals who were underqualified and lacked seriousness in crafting the curriculum. If the government truly aimed to create an excellent curriculum, it should have included critics such as Pervaiz Hoodbhoy and Tariq Rehman, who have tirelessly worked towards education reform in Pakistan.

The author also highlights that the SNC is not different from the previous curriculum. Like its predecessor, it fails to develop critical thinking skills in children. The entire focus of the curriculum is on enhancing rote learning abilities. Moreover, historical inaccuracies from the past have been repeated in the curriculum. For instance, the outdated version of the separation of Bengal remains unchanged. At this point, the author raises a significant concern: the SNC will produce children who lack the ability to think outside the box. This reminds me of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, where prisoners only perceive a distorted reality and mistake it for the complete truth. Our children will face a similar predicament. So, instead of boosting the cramming abilities of the children, the author opines there is a dire need to identify innate qualities of every child and teach him accordingly.

Turning to the Madrasah debate, the author expresses the belief that instead of bringing modern education to Madrasahs, as intended by the SNC, the opposite will occur: schools and colleges will transform into seminaries in the future. This is a cause for concern. The author does not oppose the presence of Madrasah education in the country, but firmly believes that such religious seminaries should be regulated by the state. The state should establish policies for Madrasahs and provide them with a curriculum.

The third part of the book focuses on the medium of instruction: which is more beneficial, English or Urdu? The author reiterates the viewpoint that until grade 5, the language of instruction should be the child’s mother tongue. After that, a foreign language should be introduced into the curriculum. The author supports this argument with solid evidence from scientific research. Numerous studies have demonstrated that teaching a child in their mother tongue aids in their intellectual development. Furthermore, many countries around the world follow the “Mother Tongue Plus Two” formula, where children are initially taught in their mother tongue and later introduced to foreign languages. European countries serve as a fitting example of this approach. The author also suggests that from an early age, children should be taught that English is merely a language, which helps boost their confidence. The author strongly opposes the inclusion of Arabic in the curriculum. It is just like telling a diabetic patient about the benefits of electric cars. If the government aims to teach Islam to children, it should translate the scriptures into Urdu and other native languages. The author also disputes the notion that Urdu language can foster national integration. If Urdu was able to induce national integration, then why Bengalis protested when asked to adopt Urdu.

The fourth and final part of the book comprises the author’s thoughts on the future of education in Pakistan. The author advises the government to recognize that education is primarily about developing cognitive abilities in students. It should strive to create an inclusive and pluralistic society rather than a hyper-religious one. The author also suggests that the country should follow the examples of Switzerland and Hong Kong, where children are educated in their native languages and their cognitive abilities are nurtured through proper education.

In summary, this book provides a comprehensive examination of the Single National Curriculum (SNC) and, to some extent, the education system in Pakistan. Upon delving into the lives of various renowned figures—scientists, scholars, philosophers, and revolutionaries—I discovered that many of them produced their great works in their native languages, which were later translated into other languages. Imposing foreign languages on children ultimately hampers their critical thinking abilities. For instance, in Pakistan, many students find themselves trapped in the pursuit of fluent and excellent English. In the long run, they may become fluent speakers but lose their cognitive abilities to discern truth from falsehood. Additionally, in this era of globalization, indigenous languages are gradually disappearing and being replaced by English. The only way to preserve these languages is by instilling an appreciation for them in our children. From a young age, I have heard the saying that nations are built in classrooms. It is essential to reflect upon the kind of nation we are constructing. Do we wish to create a nation of individuals who can mindlessly memorize entire pages in minutes, or a nation of enlightened minds capable of achieving wonders in the long term? Did China attain its developed status by focusing on learning English? It is high time for us to contemplate these matters. Education should always revolve around filling minds with exceptional ideas, rather than simply filling them with water.

- Advertisement -

Clash of Civilizations by Samuel P. Huntington

By
Malik Shozab
-
0

 Introduction

Samuel P. Huntington was an influential political scientist known for his analyses of the relationship between the military and the civil government, political development, and the clash of civilizations. His career was marked by a tendency to challenge dominant paradigms. In “Political Order in Changing Societies” (1968), he disputed the widely accepted view that political instability was a product of rapid social change and economic growth in developing countries. Instead, he argued that instability resulted from the lack of political institutions to support such change. However, he is perhaps best known for “The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order” (1996), Huntington’s theories have been widely debated and criticized, yet they continue to shape discussions in political science, particularly in areas of international relations and comparative politics. Despite the controversy, his work is acknowledged for its impact on scholarly thought and policy-making.

“Clash of Civilizations” by  is a seminal and influential work that redefines our understanding of the post-Cold War global order. Published in 1996, the book expands upon Huntington’s controversial 1993 essay in “Foreign Affairs,” where he first presented his civilizational conflict theory.

The book challenges traditional perspectives on global politics that emphasize ideological and economic factors as primary sources of conflict. Instead, Huntington proposes a new framework, arguing that cultural and civilizational identities will play the central role in post-Cold War conflicts. He envisages a multipolar world, divided not by political ideologies or economic structures, but by cultural civilizations.

In this new world order, the West’s influence is in decline, and non-Western civilizations are resurging to challenge its dominance. Huntington warns against the West’s assumption that all societies will adopt its values and institutions, instead advocating for mutual respect and coexistence among different civilizations.

This radical view has provoked considerable debate, with critics arguing that Huntington’s civilizational blocs are overly simplistic, potentially igniting the very conflicts they claim to predict. Regardless of the criticisms, “Clash of Civilizations” is an influential piece of literature that has left an indelible mark on the study of international relations, presenting a thought-provoking perspective that continues to stimulate academic and policy discussions worldwide.

Chapter 1: The New Era in World Politics

The first chapter introduces Huntington’s central thesis: that the main source of conflict in the future will be cultural and civilizational, not ideological or economic. He asserts that the post-Cold War world is multipolar and multicivilizational, and modernization doesn’t imply westernization. Huntington’s perspective is controversial but compelling, offering a paradigm shift in international relations theory.

Chapter 2: Civilizations in History and Today

Chapter two explores the concept of civilization throughout history. Huntington defines civilizations as the broadest cultural entities and provides an overview of their role in shaping history. He identifies seven or eight major civilizations, including Western, Confucian, Japanese, Islamic, Hindu, Slavic-Orthodox, Latin American, and possibly African civilization. This chapter offers a deep dive into global history, but the categorization can be seen as overly simplistic, failing to address the complexities within these civilizations.

Chapter 3: A Universal Civilization? Modernization and Westernization

In this chapter, Huntington confronts the debate about the “end of history,” arguing against the view that the entire world is moving toward a single, universal civilization dominated by the West. He challenges the assumption that economic modernization will lead to the adoption of Western values, suggesting instead that it can strengthen cultural identity. The perspective offered is insightful, but some readers might find it disregarding of the evidence of global interconnectivity and convergence of values.

Chapter 4: The Fading of the West: Power, Culture, and Indigenization

Huntington argues that the influence of the West is fading. He suggests that the rise of non-Western civilizations challenges Western dominance and values. While his arguments are backed by data, his perspective often seems one-sided, emphasizing the decline of the West while overlooking its enduring influence in many areas.

Chapter 5: Economics, Demography, and the Challenger Civilizations

In chapter five, Huntington delves into how economic and demographic trends might shape future conflicts. He highlights the resurgence of non-Western civilizations such as the Islamic and Sinic civilizations. The focus on economics and demography adds a nuanced dimension to his theory, though some might argue the predictions to be speculative.

Chapter 6: The Cultural Reconfiguration of Global Politics

Huntington discusses the changing alignment of civilizations in this chapter. He predicts that countries will band together based on shared cultural identities rather than ideological or economic similarities. While the idea is thought-provoking, it can be criticized for minimizing the importance of intra-civilizational differences.

Chapter 7: Core States, Concentric Circles, and Civilizational Order

Chapter seven expands on the idea of ‘core states,’ powerful countries serving as leaders or representatives of their civilizations. Huntington’s analysis is incisive, but the idea that nations would organize neatly around ‘core states’ is perhaps overly simplistic.

Chapter 8: The West, Civilizations, and Civilization

In the concluding chapter, Huntington discusses the West’s response to the emerging multipolar, multicivilizational world order. He cautions the West against attempting to impose its values on other civilizations, advocating instead for mutual respect and coexistence. His closing remarks are a timely reminder of the importance of understanding and respecting cultural diversity, though some may perceive it as a justification for cultural relativism.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, “Clash of Civilizations” remains a seminal and influential work that redefines our understanding of global politics in the post-Cold War era. While it is not without its flaws, the book continues to stimulate intellectual discourse and shape the way we think about the role of culture, power, and identity in international relations.

- Advertisement -

Baloch Women and Resistance

By
Hairbyar Baloch
-
0

Baloch women have played a vital role in the history of Baloch nation. Their stories of bravery are scripted in the golden pages of history. They have always stood side by side with men in every hard situation. A Baloch child grows up listening to the stories of Bibi Gul, Bibi Banari, Doda’s mother’s bravery, and how, with fortitude, they stood in front of enemies. In today’s world, no one can forget Lumma-e-Watan (Banuk Karima) who preached political awareness in every Baloch house. Today, if we see Baloch women in politics, it’s all the result of her struggle. She was a voice for the voiceless, not just for the Baloch but for every oppressed nation. She sacrificed herself, but never stopped raising her voice for the oppressed nation. Lumma-e-Watan is not with us physically, but she is living in the faces of Sabiha, Mahrang, Imaan, and all those raising their voices against every injustice from which the Baloch are suffering. 

Hundreds of Karima can be found on the streets of Shaal and Karachi. They are raising their voices for their beloved ones. Roads have become their second home. They are subjected to the brutality of so-called defenders; police dragged them through Karachi’s streets. In Shaal, they are being beaten by the forces, yet they demand, “Release our beloved ones.” Farzana Majeed, sister of Zakir Majeed, has been waiting for her brother for 14 years. On June 8, 2009, Zakir Majeed was abducted. Since then, Farzana and her mother have been raising their voice for Zakir’s safe release.

14 years have passed; Sammi and Mehlab are in search of their Eid Moon. They are waiting for their beloved father (Dr Deen Mohd) to come and then they will celebrate Eid like the rest of the children. They have become an example to the rest of the world of their political struggles for their father’s safe release since childhood. Like Sammi and Mehlab, many other children are growing up in a missing persons’ camp. Shari, the niece of missing student leader Shabeer Baloch, has become the “Godi of Shaal”. Shari, at the age of two, was sitting in a 51-day camp in front of the Governor’s house along with other missing persons’ families. Similarly, Fatima has become a Sangat for every student of Shaal. Today, rather than listening to stories, Baloch children themselves have become stories in books and articles.

The rest of the country gave the example of Baloch women who are raising their voices against every injustice. But now, the world has changed. They do not want to be in stories, they want their constitutional rights like the people of Islamabad and Punjab. They want their beloved ones.

Today, Baloch women have become a symbol of resistance, and they have understood this very well that, if they want to fight against the oppression of the state, then it is very noteworthy to take the path of resistance, because resistance is life.

Baloch women are knocking on every door seeking justice, from Shaal to Islamabad. They have left no doors. Advocate Imaan Zainab Mazari Baloch has become an example for so-called activists who are oblivious to the issue of Baloch missing persons. Imaan does not have any interest in becoming an example for others. She wants her Baloch brothers, who are imprisoned in dungeons; she wants the safe release of Feroz Baloch, a student of B.Ed. 2nd semester at Arid Agriculture University. On May 11, 2022, Feroz Baloch was abducted from Rawalpindi, Punjab. He cried and said, “Sir, I am a student. I am going to the library. Let me go to the library. What is my crime? “Where are you taking me?” It has been eight months since Feroz’s books are still waiting in the library. Feroz’s mother is suffering from illness, but she is still raising her voice for her beloved son.

The prevailing situation in Balochistan is not like the way that other provinces think. There is a complete blackout of every activity which is linked with human rights. LEAs are peeved with every Baloch who ask for their constitutional right. Women’s who used to be supportive to their males are now the torchbearers of every agenda that are for the safeguard of Baloch constitutional rights. In addition to the free spins bonus round, Sweet Bonanza 1xbet also includes a Tumble feature, where symbols from winning combinations are replaced by new symbols, allowing for multiple wins on a single spin. There is a kerfuffle in Baloch society that who’s going to face the hardships that one faces for being vocal to the rights of oppressed and Baloch women’s have rightly stood against the prevailing situation.

The obnoxious situation of Gwadar is in the eyes of public, a place meant to be game changer for Pakistan is in dire need of resources for daily purpose. The way Masi Zaini and other women who are on the road against the force who has everything to dismantle any peace protest. Women of Gwadar has become a symbol for every daughter in Balochistan that how one can take part and come out of their homes to counter the hardships that they are currently facing. The people of Gwadar faced eviction and destitution as fishing, their only means of livelihood was stopped by them. They have come out in number to show their anger due to which they faced the worst brutality of security forces, but their morals are not down, and they are still standing in taters against those in power.

Today, Baloch women have become a symbol of resistance, and they have understood this very well that, if they want to fight against the oppression of the state, then it is very noteworthy to take the path of resistance, because resistance is life.

- Advertisement -

Quaid-e-Azam’s Pakistan is heading toward a dangerous path

By
Jinsar Ali
-
0

Iqbal saw the dream of Pakistan and Quid-e- Azam completed his dream with strenuous efforts and struggles. Pakistan become the country for all, Muslims, Hindus, and other minorities. The founder of Pakistan ensures the rights to freedom, religion, and so on , to all minorities living here. Sadly, Pakistan suffered the loss of its leadership soon after its independence which hindered Pakistan’s progress and prosperity. 

Unfortunately, it will not be wrong to say that today, Quid’s Pakistan is heading toward a dangerous path. Perpetual economic crisis, incessant political instability, rising cleavage between civil- Military relations, the politicization of the judiciary, and the violation of press freedom are all factors that have pushed Pakistan toward a dangerous path.

The common man is suffering due to rising inflation, it wouldn’t be an overstatement to say that it has become difficult for the common man to survive in this country. However, still, there is hope that all problems can be overcome and prosperity can be brought through taking pertinent measures.

Pakistan is the fifth most populous country in the world, which has the strongest army and larger Nuclear Weapons in Asia, and is on the verge of economic collapse. Its foreign reserves are running out, which has compelled the country to knock on the door of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) which will further push the country into a debt trap and inflation.

Unfortunately, no one is taking this economic crisis seriously. Politicians are busy with their fierce  battle over power. Export has decreased to a greater extent, and inflation has risen about 35/.

Dr. Ishrat Hussain writes in his book “Governing the Ungovernable “That it is political instability that demotivates investment and business in the country. The reason for the economic crisis is this incessant political instability.  Politicians never preferred economic interests over political interests.

The relationship between the government and the opposition never improved in the history of Pakistan. Government always tries to crush the opposition. However, strong opposition is necessary for democracy. Zalmy Kahlizada recently writes, that Politicians of Pakistan must put the nation’s interests on top then their interests. Indeed, when they prefer the nation’s interests then the country will move forward toward prosperity and development. 

Pakistan Army is the strongest institution in Pakistan. It is sad to say that, currently, this institution is also abused and disrespected. After the ouster of Imran Khan through a no-confidence motion, khan is blaming Army that it was behind his ouster. No doubt he is a popular leader in Pakistan, so his words are taken seriously by his followers. Sadly, his followers are also criticizing the military. 

Recently, when Khan was arrested in the Al Qadir Trust case from High Court Islamabad by paramilitary forces, his followers directly attacked army buildings and houses which further fueled the fire. However, relations between Khan and the army have aggravated to a greater extent.

There is no denying the fact that the media is essential for democracy in Pakistan. It is one of the principles of Democracy. Unfortunately, in Pakistan, its rights have been violated constantly. Whenever media channels report their news against the government, then they face severe punishment and endure illegal bans on their channels.

When journalists talk against the government then they put them behind bars. Unfortunately, it is a violation of press freedom. It is a violation of freedom of speech. Hence, media and journalists should be given the freedom to a greater extent.

The judiciary is one of the strongest pillars of democracy. It is an institution where all are equal.  It is sad to say that in Pakistan it is not respected. Its decisions are not welcomed and accepted by the heart.

When it announces its decision not in favor of the government, then they, open the arrows of criticism. If it does not decide in favor of the opposition then they open fire on criticism over it. This has been experienced recently when the Supreme Court Of Pakistan decided two important de decisions which restored the National Assembly and Suo Moto on Election in Punjab and KPK elections.

In a nutshell, it can be said that Quid’s Pakistan is heading toward a dangerous path. The sufferings of the common man are increasing day by day. Journalists who spoke the truth are behind bars. Media channels that show reality are banned. The judiciary which decides its decisions according to law and constitution is under severe criticism. Elections have been delayed. However, it shows that Quid-e-Azam’s Pakistan is heading toward the path of Autocracy.

- Advertisement -

Hybrid Warfare: Unveiling its Severe Impacts on Modern Societies:

By
Muhammad Mubashir
-
0

Introduction


In the ever-evolving landscape of warfare, a new form of conflict has emerged, known as hybrid warfare. This strategy involves the blending of conventional and unconventional tactics, including cyber-attacks, disinformation campaigns, economic coercion, proxy wars etc. Hybrid warfare has the potential to cause severe impacts on both states and societies, as it exploits vulnerabilities across multiple domains. In this article, we will delve into the nature of hybrid warfare and explore its profound consequences.

Understanding Hybrid Warfare

Hybrid warfare is a complex and multifaceted concept that aims to exploit the weaknesses of an adversary while maintaining plausible deniability. It combines traditional military operations with non-military tools to achieve strategic objectives. This approach leverages a combination of kinetic force, information warfare, economic pressure, and subversion to erode an opponent’s capabilities, undermine their political stability, and manipulate public opinion.

Severe Impacts of Hybrid Warfare

Destabilization of States: Hybrid warfare often seeks to exploit existing divisions within a society, amplifying internal conflicts and fueling social unrest. By leveraging disinformation campaigns and supporting proxy groups, aggressors can exacerbate existing fault lines within a targeted state, leading to political and social instability. This can result in the collapse of governance structures, economic downturns, and widespread violence.


Undermining Democracy and Trust: Hybrid warfare thrives on the erosion of trust and the manipulation of public opinion. Through the dissemination of false information and propaganda, adversaries aim to sow discord and confusion within target populations. This can undermine democratic processes, polarize societies, and create an environment where misinformation reigns supreme. The erosion of trust in institutions and the media can have long-lasting impacts on social cohesion and the functioning of democratic systems.


Economic Disruption: Hybrid warfare includes economic coercion as a means to weaken an adversary. By targeting critical infrastructure, disrupting supply chains, or imposing sanctions, aggressors can inflict significant economic harm. This can lead to recessions, unemployment, and a loss of investor confidence. The economic consequences of hybrid warfare can be far-reaching, affecting not only the targeted state but also regional and global economies.


Cyber-Attacks and Infrastructure Vulnerability: The use of cyber-attacks is a prominent feature of hybrid warfare. Critical infrastructure, such as power grids, transportation systems, and financial networks, are vulnerable to cyber threats. By compromising these systems, aggressors can cause widespread disruption, hampering daily life and compromising national security. Cyber-attacks can also target military assets, compromising command and control systems, and diminishing a state’s ability to respond effectively.


Escalation and Destabilization of International Relations: Hybrid warfare blurs the lines between war and peace, making it difficult to attribute attacks to specific actors. This ambiguity can lead to heightened tensions and potential escalations between states. Moreover, the use of proxy forces allows aggressors to distance themselves from direct involvement, making it challenging for the international community to respond decisively. This can create a volatile global environment and hinder diplomatic efforts to resolve conflicts peacefully.

Conclusion


Hybrid warfare poses a significant threat to modern societies, leveraging a range of tactics to exploit vulnerabilities and achieve strategic objectives. Its severe impacts are far-reaching, affecting political stability, social cohesion, economies, and international relations. Countering hybrid warfare requires a comprehensive approach, encompassing robust cyber defenses, effective intelligence sharing, international cooperation, and resilient societies that can withstand the onslaught of disinformation. By understanding and addressing the complex nature of hybrid warfare, states can strive to mitigate its severe impacts and safeguard their societies in an era of evolving threats

- Advertisement -

LETTERS TO A YOUNG MUSLIM: BOOK REVIEW

By
Malik Shozab
-
0

As we all know that it is an age of islamophobia. Even we the pure and by birth Muslims sometimes fear from religious extremism or it will be better to use the exact terminology which is Islamic extremism or fundamentalism. So imagine what will be the condition of Islam in the west if it is the condition of it in an Islamic country.

In this book “Letters to a Young Muslim “Omer Saif Ghobash who is an ambassador of UAE to Russia, has tried to spread the light on true face of Islam. To tell the world especially the west that Islam does not has to do anything with fundamentalism or extremism. Islam is a religion of peace. Who talks on human rights, and spreads love. The extremism is act of some fundamentalists who knows nothing about Islam. All they do is to use Islam to achieve their political goals.

Not only that but he has also spread light on Salafism or you can say Wahhabism. That how abdul wahab boosted the spread of extremism by the name of pure and original form of Islam. He further elaborated the American invasions of that particular areas from which we can witness the terrorism. It seems like he wanted to say that the terrorism is merely a reaction of American aggression. This ideology and some other factors which we will discuss further in this review led Mr Omer Saif Ghobash to write down these letters to his son Saif.

This book is based on twenty seven letters. Which are written by Mr Ghobash to his elder son Saif.To highlight the reason of these letters there are two incidents in this book which are very important to quote. Without which I cannot tell the reason of these letters. Because these are not ordinary letters. The author said that these letters are not only for my son Saif but for all the young Muslims around the entire world.

The first incident which became an important reason for these letters or this book is that the protagonist was just a little child when his father got executed because of extremism when he was merely just at school along with his other siblings. He couldn’t forgot this incident till date. He says that his father had no time for him as of dying so early. We will further discuss this incident but first let us come towards the second and the incident of equal importance for these letters.

Mr Ghobash realized that it is not only them (the parents) who are generating the mind of his elder son Saif but the environment and especially his teachers at school are also playing far more important role in this regard. He realized that the teachers are impacting him more than the parents. His son was coming up with different behavior, based on the ideology of Salafism. His son would come up with more aggressive behavior each day.

Aforementioned are the two main and highlighted reasons because of which the author has to write this book. As he mentioned in this book that who knows that he may also die like his father leaving his son deprived of his experiences. As I have mentioned that he was an ambassador so he was already living far away from his family in Russia. He decided to write these letters to his elder son in order to make him grow in a wise and pure way.

The Middle East has always been of great importance because of a lot of reasons. It has been a nexus and a playground for great powers till today. America has invaded different countries of this region many times. Not only that but this region also has great and rich history which also has great impacts on the entire globe. Mr Ghobash was born in this very region to a Russian mother and an Arab father in United Arab Emirates.

The reason of mentioning all this is that these letters are very important for us to know some history, reality and important facts as well. As Mr Ghobash is an ambassador and is born in June 1971. This era carries significance. In these articles he discussed about Saddam Hussain, Iraq-Iran war, Kuwait issues and a lot more.

 As I have already mentioned in above paragraph that the protagonist has done a good work by portraying the message that Islam is a peaceful religion. Islam doesn’t teaches fundamentalism. But this is exactly where I would say that why we have to prove that we are peaceful? When America invaded all those countries which are not hidden by the world, did she proved any peace in it? No she didn’t. Because it’s only the weak who has to tell the strong that we are peaceful. Strong doesn’t care for others. They always do whatever they want. Just because we the Muslims are week that’s why we have to tell everyone that we are peaceful.

Peace is an illusion, created by the powerful to manipulate the week and morons. Imagine if a lion apply the theory of peace on himself, would he become peaceful? No, he will become dead! It is the need for a lion to attack and eat what he want and can. There are no moral or legal obligations on him.

The same case can be applied on an ideology. It is a need for an ideology to dominate others outside its territory. Whether if it’s Religion, Culture or if its ideologies like Capitalism or Communism. If it became peaceful, it will vanish.

So instead of criticizing those who are promoting their ideology, Mr.Omer has to write a speedy way to spread the ideology of Islam. Just like American ideology is doing. And that is the only specific way to survive in this world. Especially for an ideology. This is exactly where the author has tried to spread American ideology of peace in the name of Islam. Because. Islam is not a religion of peace. Islam is a religion of courage, religion of bravery, religion of God. A religion which has no frontiers. It has to be prevail on the entire globe. Be it may in the American way (aggressively) or in the Chinese way (peacefully). It is what it is. Instead of being shameful we should all be prideful together and support those who are spreading our ideology across the globe.

- Advertisement -

HYBRID WARFARE & GREY ZONE

By
Inshal Haider
-
0

Hybrid warfare is a form of conflict that involves multiple actors, domains, and methods. It aims to achieve strategic goals without triggering a conventional war or direct overt violence. Hybrid warfare exploits the vulnerabilities of the adversary through a combination of military and non-military means, such as cyberattacks, disinformation, economic coercion, proxy forces, and political subversion. Hybrid warfare challenges the traditional notions of war and peace and the legal and ethical frameworks that govern them.

First, in 2005, two US military officials wrote about the “rise of hybrid wars” and emphasized the combination of conventional and unconventional strategies, methods, and tactics in contemporary warfare including the psychological and information-related aspects of modern conflicts.

One of the key features of hybrid warfare is the deliberate creation of ambiguity and uncertainty. Hybrid actors make it hard for the target to find and attribute the source of the threat while concealing their involvement and responsibility for their actions. This also makes it difficult for the target to respond effectively and proportionally, as it may face political and legal constraints, as well as public opinion pressures.

Hybrid actors can exploit the gaps and inconsistencies between various domains and regions, encompassing land, sea, air, space, and cyberspace. By running below the threshold of war or direct overt violence, hybrid actors aim to achieve their goals without provoking a full-scale military response from the target or its allies.

The characteristics of Hybrid Warfare remain deeply connected to the principles espoused by Sun Tzu, who famously said that “The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.” Because of these attributes, Hybrid conflict has been increasingly more hired in a political, irregular, and conventional conflict with a big effect.

Hybrid Warfare in politics aims to influence the opinions, emotions, attitudes, and behavior of target audiences through various methods, such as propaganda, disinformation, cyber-attacks, economic pressure, lawfare, and foreign electoral intervention. Political warfare looks to undermine the legitimacy, credibility, and cohesion of an adversary, and to create confusion, division, and distrust among its population and institutions.

Hybrid warfare poses significant challenges to the international security and defense community. It requires a multi-faceted approach that integrates all instruments of national power and uses multilateral cooperation and partnerships.

Whereas, irregular warfare involves the use of non-state actors, such as militias, insurgents, terrorists, criminals, and hackers, to conduct violent or disruptive activities against an adversary. Irregular warfare can also include the use of regular forces in a covert or deniable manner, such as the deployment of special forces or proxy forces. Irregular warfare aims to create instability, insecurity, and chaos in an adversary’s territory or region, and to erode its will and ability to resist. In addition, conventional warfare is the use of state actors and regular forces to conduct kinetic operations against an adversary.

One example of the use of hybrid warfare in politics is the Russian intervention in Ukraine in 2014. Russia used a combination of conventional and irregular methods, such as deploying special forces, supporting local armed groups, conducting cyberattacks, spreading disinformation, and exploiting ethnic and political divisions in Ukraine.

According to the Russian President, Russia also denied its involvement and tried to avoid attribution or retribution. This hybrid approach allowed Russia to achieve its strategic aims of annexing Crimea and destabilizing eastern Ukraine while avoiding a confrontation with NATO.

GREY ZONE- The Complex Conflict Landscape

Grey zone is a term that describes the space between peace and war, where state and non-state actors use various methods of influence and coercion to achieve their strategic aims without triggering a conventional military response.

Grey zone and hybrid warfare are closely related concepts that reflect the changing nature and character of warfare in the 21st century. They challenge the traditional assumptions and norms of international law and security and pose significant risks and challenges for states and societies.

To counter grey zone and hybrid threats, states need to develop comprehensive and adaptive strategies that use all elements of national power, enhance resilience and deterrence, and foster cooperation and coordination with allies and partners.

In pursuing zero-sum security goals hybrid warfare is increasing between states below the threshold of an armed conflict. Recent studies on wars in Afghanistan and Iraq prove how expensive all- eschewal wars can be in terms of mortal, profitable, as well as social, and political losses.

Advancement in technology is rising, asymmetric warfare making all-out wars ineffective which results in the tough proposition of victory in the wars. Briefly, the nature of conflict stays the same, but the overall security environment is changing.

 “Struggle is not anything extra than the continuation of politics with the aid of different approaches,” Clausewitz said. In this contemporary period, the matrix of warfare has become overly complex, and the dynamics of war are in a state of flux. While war now means a range of possibilities. Sometimes, it might entail kinetic operations and sometimes involve launching cyberattacks. Comparable avenues are expansive and so are how they may be juxtaposed.

Hybrid warfare makes conflict dynamics murky. Another, yet unconsidered way in which a state’s security can be threatened is through challenges to its legitimacy. As a Norwegian Employer for Development Cooperation document notes, “kingdom legitimacy concerns the very foundation on which it linked to state and society and with the aid of which national authority is justified.”

Thus, the hybrid actor tries to erode trust between the institutions and the people of the state, which results in the loss of legitimacy of the state. Both the theoretical foundations and the kingdom’s functionality are broken via crossbred assaults.

Hence, Hybrid warfare poses significant challenges to the international security and defense community. It requires a multi-faceted approach that integrates all instruments of national power and uses multilateral cooperation and partnerships. It also requires a resilient and adaptable mindset that can cope with uncertainty and ambiguity. Hybrid warfare demands constant vigilance and readiness to counter and deter hybrid threats in all domains and at all levels.

- Advertisement -

The Rising Asia

By
Malik Shozab
-
0

In recent years, Asia has emerged as a rising power in the world, challenging the dominance of the West and shifting the balance of power in global politics and economics. This new era of Asian power has been driven by the economic growth and development of countries like China, India, Japan, South Korea, and others, who have been able to capitalize on their resources, human capital, and strategic locations to become key players on the world stage. This article examines the rise of Asia and the role of different rising Asian powers in shaping the future of the world.

For much of the twentieth century, the world was dominated by the West, particularly by the United States and Europe. However, in recent years, the rise of Asia has challenged this dominance and shifted the balance of power in global politics and economics. The rise of Asia has been driven by the economic growth and development of countries in the region, particularly China and India. In addition, other rising powers in Asia, such as Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines, have also played important roles. This article examines the rise of Asia and the role of different rising Asian powers in shaping the future of the world.

One of the key factors driving the rise of Asia has been the economic growth and development of countries in the region. Over the past few decades, countries like China and India have achieved remarkable economic growth rates, fueled by their large populations, natural resources, and strategic locations. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), China is now the world’s second-largest economy, with a gross domestic product (GDP) of $16.14 trillion in 2020, while India is the sixth-largest economy, with a GDP of $2.9 trillion in the same year.

The implications of Asia’s rise are significant and could lead to increased competition, tensions, and conflicts, but also to new opportunities for cooperation, integration, and stability.

The economic growth and development of these countries have not only lifted millions of people out of poverty but have also created new markets, opportunities, and challenges for the rest of the world. For example, China has become a major player in global trade, accounting for around 13% of the world’s total trade in 2019 (World Bank, 2021), and is also a major investor in countries across Asia, Africa, and Europe through its Belt and Road Initiative. Similarly, India has emerged as a leader in information technology and software development, with companies like Infosys, Wipro, and Tata Consultancy Services dominating the global IT outsourcing market.

While China and India have been the primary drivers of the rise of Asia, other countries in the region have also played important roles in shaping the future of the world. Japan, for example, is a major economic power and is home to some of the world’s largest and most innovative companies, including Toyota, Sony, and Nintendo. Japan has also been a key player in global governance, promoting free trade, multilateralism, and environmental protection.

South Korea is another rising power in Asia that has made significant strides in economic development and innovation. Companies like Samsung and LG have dominated the global electronics market, contributing to South Korea’s economic growth and development. South Korea has also played a critical role in regional security, particularly as tensions with North Korea have led to increased cooperation with the United States and other countries in the region. South Korea’s role in Asia is expected to increase as it continues to invest in new technologies and expand its economic and political influence in the region.

Other rising Asian powers, such as Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines, have also shown impressive economic growth and development in recent years. These countries are strategically located and are home to large populations, making them attractive destinations for foreign investment and trade. Indonesia is the world’s fourth-largest country by population and is expected to become one of the world’s largest economies by 2050. Vietnam has become a major manufacturing hub and a key player in global trade, while the Philippines has emerged as a leader in the business process outsourcing industry.

The rise of Asia has significant implications for the future of the world, both in terms of economics and politics. Economically, the growth and development of Asian countries are expected to continue, as they continue to innovate and expand their markets. This could lead to new opportunities for businesses, investors, and workers in Asia and beyond.

Politically, the rise of Asia could lead to a shift in the balance of power, as countries in the region become more assertive and challenge the dominance of the West. This could lead to increased competition, tensions, and conflicts, especially as countries like China seek to expand their influence and assert their interests.

However, the rise of Asia could also present new opportunities for cooperation and collaboration, as countries in the region work together to address common challenges and pursue shared goals. This could lead to greater regional integration, cooperation, and stability, as well as new opportunities for diplomacy and dialogue.

In conclusion, the rise of Asia represents a new era in global politics and economics, as countries in the region have become key players on the world stage. While China and India have been the primary drivers of this rise, other rising powers in Asia, such as Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Vietnam, and the Philippines, have also played important roles. The implications of this rise are significant and could lead to increased competition, tensions, and conflicts, but also to new opportunities for cooperation, integration, and stability. As the world adjusts to this new reality, it is important for policymakers, businesses, and individuals to understand the dynamics of the region and work to build bridges of cooperation and collaboration.

- Advertisement -

CPEC and locals of Gwadar

By
Hairbyar Baloch
-
0

CPEC is one of the six economic corridors of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) where there are 2600 projects in 139 countries that China has signed and none of these countries has propagated these projects like Pakistan. The total investment of China in CPEC is $62 billion, of which most of the investments are being made in infrastructure projects.

The narratives being built by Pakistani intellectuals that CPEC is a game-changer for Pakistan’s economy is a blessing from Allah to Pakistan. On the other hand, there are voices from local people that say this is another east Indian company for them, but politicians and official intellectuals are neglecting this and say these narratives are negative propaganda by our enemies to fail the CPEC project. Thus, they are busy building the minds of people by presenting the Islamic point of view that Allah is blessing Pakistan through this project.

However, the locals of Gwadar are concerned about their future because they are witnessing neo-colonial tactics in their region. Such acts include fencing Gwadar and isolating it from the rest of Baluchistan for ostensibly security reasons, prohibiting locals from entering Gwadar port, and denying the people of Gwadar basic rights, forcing them to migrate to other cities and villages so that housing schemes for Chinese people can be built in Gwadar.

The people of Baluchistan have been protesting in Gwadar for months for basic rights such as water, electricity, and the return of a missing person, but the government is not interested in listening to them while the Pakistani media sleeps on Baluchistan issues.

Surprisingly, when Siraj ul Haq visited the protest in Gwadar, he blamed everything on the Indians and made the local people confused in this regard. If it is the case that India is involved and is responsible for the current law and order situation in Baluchistan, it raises the question of who is responsible for the provision of basic rights to its people: Pakistan or India? The locals of Gwadar are worried that, like Hambantota International Port in Sri Lanka, which is owned by China, their future will be the same as in the Cambodian town of Sihanoukville, where all businesses are run by the Chinese population and the locals are being ruled by Chinese elites.

No doubt, if they don’t resist now, their fate will be like that of the Sri Lankan and Cambodians. Therefore, it is the need of the hour for the locals of Baluchistan to be part of movements such as “Baluchistan Ko Haq Do” to raise their voices against the colonial power.

- Advertisement -
1...202122...55Page 21 of 55
- Advertisement -

POPULAR POSTS

POPULAR CATEGORY

©