The ever-evolving security paradigm
The world of the 21st century, since its beginning, witnessed new threats and threat perceptions. It saw the terrorist attacks on twin towers in America, the illegal Iraq invasion, the economic crisis of 2008, Arab uprising, climate change,The trade war between two giant economic powers, and the recent outburst of global pandemic named CoronoVirus showing major changes to security paradigm.
With the growing nature of threat and threat perceptions, Barry Buzan, a Professor of International Relations at the London School of Economics, came up with a new concept of security to counter the updated or new versions of various threats. security paradigm
In International Relations, the classical or traditional concept of security revolved around the mitigation of external military threats. However, the emergence of new threats within and without states compelled the policy strategists to look for a broader horizon of security for their states. security paradigm
Barry Buzan gave his five sectors of security through which new threats can be countered and state security can be ensured. This article will discuss the changing dynamics of international security after the emergence of new threats. security paradigm
To evaluate the changing dynamics of international security, one must look at the traditional concept of security.
Walter Lippmann, an American writer, and political commentator defined the classical or traditional concept of security as, “A nation is secure if it is not in danger of having to sacrifice its core values. security paradigm
And is able, if challenged, to maintain them by victory in such wars.” Previously, the states used to consider them safe and secure, when their territorial integrity was not threatened.
However, the arrival of new threats like civil wars, economic crisis, global warming, and the spread of global pandemics led the policy strategists to secure their states from traditional and nontraditional threats as well. security paradigm
During these times, a Professor in the United Kingdom, Barry Buzan, gave his nontraditional concept of security. According to Prof. Barry Buzan, “The security is the ability of a state and society to maintain its independence, identity, and functional integration.”
Prof. Barry Buzan’s concept of nontraditional security revolved around five major sectors i.e. Societal, Political, Economical, Military, and Environmental Security. All of them will be discussed below: security paradigm
The first and the most important sector of security, according to Barry Buzan, is Societal Security. Prof. Buzan urged policy strategists to secure their state from societal insecurities.
Societal insecurity exists then a society defines development as a threat to its existence. For instance, refugees in Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, and Germany are considered a threat to their existence. security paradigm
Moreover, ethnic disharmony is also a threat in multi-ethnic societies such as Pakistan and India. As per Prof. Buzan, the second sector of security is political security.
Prof. Buzan argued that a state can only be considered politically secure when its sovereignty is not challenged. security paradigm
There should be no state within a state. To guarantee its political security, a state must ensure a smooth power transfer from one government to another government.
In Pakistan, its people witnessed four Marshall Laws because Pakistan was politically not secured. However, after the promulgation of the Eighteenth Constitutional Amendment, Pakistan has mitigated the threat of political insecurity to some extent. security paradigm
Furthermore, the third sector of security is economic security. The main objective of economic security, as per Prof, Buzan, is to develop rules that generate enough revenue for state sustenance. security paradigm
Moreover, the state policies must have compatibility with regional and international economic rules. For example, the United States’ military power is not the cause of its superpower status; rather it is the consequence of its giant economy.
Moreover, Prof. Buzan has not neglected the military sector of security. The fourth important sector of security is military security.
According to Prof. Buzan, a state is militarily secure when it has the state of the art of weapons and technology, sound training of military forces with sufficient numbers of military personals. Likewise, for Prof. Buzan, the fifth and last sector of security is environmental security. security paradigm
For this purpose, Prof Buzan argued that a state has to secure itself against environmental degradation, famines, global warming, food shortages, droughts, floods, earthquakes, and tsunamis.
However, environmental weapons like High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) have been developed by many countries to counter environmental threats. security paradigm
To sum up the whole discussion, in a nutshell, it can be concluded that with the emergence of new threats and threat perceptions in the 21st-century world, the concept of international security has transformed from a classical or traditional concept to a nontraditional concept.
The traditional concept of security revolved around territorial security from external military attacks. However, with external military aggression, the nontraditional concept of security also covers the new threats and new threat perceptions.
In this regard, British Prof. Buzan gave his five important sectors of society i.e. Societal, Political, Economical, Military, and Environmental.